- Few Ineffective Approaches
- A Pragmatic Wishlist
- Building the Config Management Pipeline
- Accessing the Configs
- Extending the Pipeline
Updated on 2020-07-13: Fixed dealing with global configs
Managing configurations in your Python applications isn’t something you think about much often, until complexity starts to seep in and forces you to re-architect your initial approach. Ideally, your config management flow shouldn’t change across different applications or as your application begins to grow in size and complexity. Even if you’re writing a library, there should be a consistent config management process that scales up properly. Since I primarily spend my time writing data-analytics, data-science applications and expose them using Flask or FastAPI framework, I’ll be tacking config management from an application development perspective.
Few Ineffective Approaches
In the past, while exposing APIs with Flask, I used to use
Config class approach to manage configs which is pretty much a standard in the Flask realm. However, it quickly became cumbersome to maintain and juggle between configs depending on development, staging or production environments. There were additional application specific global constants to deal with too. So I tried using
*.toml based config management approaches but those too, quickly turned into a tangled mess. I was constantly accessing variables buried into 3-4 levels of nested toml data structure and it wasn’t pretty. Then there are config management libraries like Dynaconf or environ-config that aim to ameliorate the issue. While these are all amazing tools but they also introduce their own custom workflow that can feel over-engineered while dealing with maintenance and extension.
A Pragmatic Wishlist
I wanted to take a declarative approach while designing a config management pipleline that will be modular, scalable and easy to maintain. To meet my requirements, the system should be able to:
- Read configs from
.envfiles and shell environment at the same time.
- Handle dependency injection for introducing passwords or secrets.
- Convert variable types automatically in the appropriate cases, e.g. string to integer conversion.
- Keep development, staging and production configs separate.
- Switch between the different environments e.g development, staging effortlessly.
- Inspect the active config values
- Create arbitrarily nested config structure if required (Not encouraged though. Constraints fosters creativity, remember?)
Building the Config Management Pipeline
The code block that appears in this section is self contained. It should run without any modifications. If you want to play along, then just spin up a Python virtual environment and install
python-dotenv. The following commands works on any *nix based system:
python3.8 -m venv venv source venv/bin/activate pip install pydantic python-dotenv
Make sure you have fairly a recent version of
Python 3 installed, preferably
Python 3.8. You might need to install
python3.8 venv. If you’re on Ubuntu Linux, you can do so with
sudo apt install python3.8-venv command.
Introduction to Pydantic
To check off all the boxes of the wishlist above, I made a custom config management flow using Pydantic, python-dotenv and the
.env file. Pydantic is a fantastic data validation library that can be used for validating and implicitly converting data types using Python’s type hints. Type hinting is a formal solution to statically indicate the type of a value within your Python code. It was specified in PEP 484 and introduced in Python 3.5. Let’s define and validate the attributes of a class named
from Pydantic import BaseModel class User(BaseModel): name: str username: str password: int user = User(name="Redowan Delowar", username="rednafi", password="123") print(user)
This will give you:
>>> User(name='Redowan Delowar', username='rednafi', password=123)
In the above example, I defined a simple class named
User and used Pydantic for data validation. Pydantic will make sure that the data you assign to the class attributes conform with the types you’ve annotated. Notice, how I’ve assigned a string type data in the
password field and Pydantic converted it to integer type without complaining. That’s because the corresponding type annotation suggests that the
password attribute of the
User class should be an integer. When implicit conversion is not possible or the hinted value of an attribute doesn’t conform to its assigned type, Pydantic will throw a
Now let’s see how you can orchestrate your config management flow with the tools mentioned above. For simplicity, let’s say you’ve 3 sets of configurations.
- Configs of your app’s internal logic
- Development environment configs
- Production environment configs
In this case, other than the first set of configs, all should go into the
I’ll be using this
.env file for demonstration. If you’re following along, then go ahead, create an empty
.env file there and copy the variables mentioned below:
#.env ENV_STATE="dev" # or prod DEV_REDIS_HOST="127.0.0.1" DEV_REDIS_PORT="4000" PROD_REDIS_HOST="127.0.0.2" PROD_REDIS_PORT="5000"
Notice how I’ve used the
PROD_ prefixes before the environment specific configs. These help you discern between the variables designated for different environments.
Configs related to your application’s internal logic should either be explicitly mentioned in the same
configs.pyor imported from a different
app_configs.pyfile. You shouldn’t pollute your
.envfiles with the internal global variables necessitated by your application’s core logic.
Now let’s dump the entire config orchestration and go though the building blocks one by one:
# configs.py from typing import Optional from pydantic import BaseSettings, Field, BaseModel class AppConfig(BaseModel): """Application configurations.""" VAR_A: int = 33 VAR_B: float = 22.0 class GlobalConfig(BaseSettings): """Global configurations.""" # These variables will be loaded from the .env file. However, if # there is a shell environment variable having the same name, # that will take precedence. APP_CONFIG: AppConfig = AppConfig() # define global variables with the Field class ENV_STATE: Optional[str] = Field(None, env="ENV_STATE") # environment specific variables do not need the Field class REDIS_HOST: Optional[str] = None REDIS_PORT: Optional[int] = None REDIS_PASS: Optional[str] = None class Config: """Loads the dotenv file.""" env_file: str = ".env" class DevConfig(GlobalConfig): """Development configurations.""" class Config: env_prefix: str = "DEV_" class ProdConfig(GlobalConfig): """Production configurations.""" class Config: env_prefix: str = "PROD_" class FactoryConfig: """Returns a config instance dependending on the ENV_STATE variable.""" def __init__(self, env_state: Optional[str]): self.env_state = env_state def __call__(self): if self.env_state == "dev": return DevConfig() elif self.env_state == "prod": return ProdConfig() cnf = FactoryConfig(GlobalConfig().ENV_STATE)() print(cnf.__repr__())
The print statement of the last line in the above code block is to inspect the active configuration class. You’ll soon learn what I meant by the term active configuration. You can comment out the last line while using the code in production. Let’s explain what’s going on with each of the classes defined above.
AppConfig class defines the config variables required for you API’s internal logic. In this case I’m not loading the variables from the
.env file, rather defining them directly in the class. You can also define and import them from another
app_configs.py file if necessary but they shouldn’t be placed in the
.env file. For data validation to work, you’ve to inherit from Pydantic’s
BaseModel and annotate the attributes using type hints while constructing the
AppConfig class. Later, this class is called from the
GlobalConfig class to build a nested data structure.
GlobalConfig defines the variables that propagates through other environment classes and the attributes of this class are globally accessible from all other environments. In this class, the variables are loaded from the
.env file. In the
.env file, global variables don’t have any environment specific prefixes like
PROD_ before them. The class
GlobalConfig inherits from Pydantic’s
BaseSettings which helps to load and read the variables from the
.env file. The
.env file itself is loaded in the nested
Config class. Although the environment variables are loaded from the
.env file, Pydantic also loads your actual shell environment variables at the same time. From Pydantic’s [documentation]:
Even when using a dotenv file, Pydantic will still read environment variables as well as the dotenv file, environment variables will always take priority over values loaded from a dotenv file.
This means you can keep the sensitive variables in your
zshrc and Pydantic will inject them during runtime. It’s a powerful feature, as it implies that you can easily keep the insensitive variables in your
.env file and include that to the version control system. Meanwhile the sensitive information should be injected as a shell environment variable. For example, although I’ve defined an attribute called
REDIS_PASS in the
GlobalConfig class, there is no mention of any
REDIS_PASS variable in the
.env file. So normally, it returns
None but you can easily inject a password into the
REDIS_PASS variable from the shell. Assuming that you’ve set up your
venv and installed the dependencies, you can test it by copying the contents of the above code snippet in file called
configs.py and running the commands below:
export DEV_REDIS_PASS=ubuntu python configs.py
This should printout:
>>> DevConfig(ENV_STATE='dev', APP_CONFIG=AppConfig(VAR_A=33, VAR_B=22.0), REDIS_PASS='ubuntu', REDIS_HOST='127.0.0.1', REDIS_PORT=4000)
Notice how your injected
REDIS_PASS has appeared in the printed config class instance. Although I injected
DEV_REDIS_PASS into the environment variable, it appeared as
REDIS_PASS inside the
DevConfig instance. This is convenient because you won’t need to change the name of the variables in your codebase when you change the environment. To understand why it printed an instance of the
DevConfig class, refer to the FactoryConfig section.
DevConfig class inherits from the
GlobalConfig class and it can define additional variables specific to the development environment. It inherits all the variables defined in the
GlobalConfig class. In this case, the
DevConfig class doesn’t define any new variable.
Config class inside
DevConfig defines an attribute
env_prefix and assigns
DEV_ prefix to it. This helps Pydantic to read your prefixed variables like
DEV_REDIS_PORT etc without you having to explicitly mention them.
ProdConfig class also inherits from the
GlobalConfig class and it can define additional variables specific to the production environment. It inherits all the variables defined in the
GlobalConfig class. In this case, like
DevConfig this class doesn’t define any new variable.
Config class inside
ProdConfig defines an attribute
env_prefix and assigns
PROD_ prefix to it. This helps Pydantic to read your prefixed variables like
PROD_REDIS_PORT etc without you having to explicitly mention them.
FactoryConfig is the controller class that dictates which config class should be activated based on the environment state defined as
ENV_STATE in the
.env file. If it finds
ENV_STATE="dev" then the control flow statements in the
FactoryConfig class will activate the development configs (DevConfig). Similarly, if
ENV_STATE="prod" is found then the control flow will activate the production configs (ProdConfig). Since the current environment state is
ENV_STATE="dev", when you run the code, it prints an instance of the activated
DevConfig class. This way, you can assign different values to the same variable based on different environment contexts.
You can also dynamically change the environment by changing the value of
ENV_STATE on your shell. Run:
EXPORT ENV_STATE="prod" python configs.py
This time the config instance should change and print the following:
>>> ProdConfig(ENV_STATE='prod', APP_CONFIG=AppConfig(VAR_A=33, VAR_B=22.0), REDIS_PASS='ubuntu', REDIS_HOST='127.0.0.2', REDIS_PORT=5000)
Accessing the Configs
Using the config variables is easy. Suppose you want use the variables in file called
app.py. You can easily do so as shown in the following code block:
# app.py from configs import cnf APP_CONFIG = cnf.APP_CONFIG VAR_A = APP_CONFIG.VAR_A # this is a nested config VAR_B = APP_CONFIG.VAR_B REDIS_HOST = cnf.REDIS_HOST # this is a top-level config REDIS_PORT = cnf.REDIS_PORT print(APP_CONFIG) print(VAR_A) print(VAR_B) print(REDIS_HOST) print(REDIS_PORT)
This should print out:
>>> ProdConfig(ENV_STATE='prod', APP_CONFIG=AppConfig(VAR_A=33, VAR_B=22.0), REDIS_PASS='ubuntu', REDIS_HOST='127.0.0.2', REDIS_PORT=5000) VAR_A=33 VAR_B=22.0 33 22.0 127.0.0.2 5000
Extending the Pipeline
The modular design demonstrated above is easy to maintain and extend in my opinion. Previously, for simplicity, I’ve defined only two environment scopes; development and production. Let’s say you want to add the configs for your staging environment.
First you’ll need to add those staging variables to the
... STAGE_REDIS_HOST="127.0.0.3" STAGE_REDIS_PORT="6000" ...
Then you’ve to create a class named
StageConfigthat inherits from the
GlobalConfigclass. The architecture of the class is similar to that of the
# configs.py ... class StageConfig(GlobalConfig): """Staging configurations.""" class Config: env_prefix : str = "STAGE_" ...
Finally, you’ll need to insert an
ENV_STATElogic into the control flow of the
FactoryConfigclass. See how I’ve appended another if-else block to the previous (prod) block.
# configs.py ... class FactoryConfig: """Returns a config instance depending on the ENV_STATE variable.""" def __init__(self, env_state: Optional[str]): self.env_state = env_state def __call__(self): if self.env_state == "dev": return DevConfig() elif self.env_state == "prod": return ProdConfig() elif self.env_state == "stage" return StageConfig() ...
To see your new addition in action just change the
ENV_STATE to “stage” in the
.env file or export it to your shell environment.
export ENV_STATE="stage" python configs.py
This will print out an instance of the class
The above workflow works perfectly for my usage scenario. So subjectively, I feel like it’s an elegant solution to a very icky problem. Your mileage may vary. All the pieces of codes in the blog were written and tested with python 3.8 on a machine running Ubuntu 20.04.